2008 BMW 316 vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2008 BMW 316 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2008 BMW 316. (113 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 316. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 316 weights approximately 313 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron.
Because 2008 BMW 316 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW 316. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 316 | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 316 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1465 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2580 mm |