2008 BMW 320 vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 2008 BMW 320 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1951 Humber Pullman. (100 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1951 Humber Pullman. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 562 kg more than 2008 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 320 | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
Make | BMW | Humber |
Model | 320 | Pullman |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4085 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 120 mm |
Top Speed | 219 km/hour | 132 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 2032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 3330 mm |