2008 BMW 320 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2008 BMW 320 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 215 kg more than 2008 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Buick 40 (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 320. (200 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1954 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 320 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 320 | 40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3110 mm |