2008 BMW 320 vs. 1954 Buick 40
To start off, 2008 BMW 320 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,328 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 320 (161 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1954 Buick 40. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1954 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Buick 40 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2008 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 320 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Buick 40. (309 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 320 | 1954 Buick 40 | |
Make | BMW | Buick |
Model | 320 | 40 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 4328 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 161 HP | 141 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 309 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3110 mm |