2008 BMW 320 vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody

To start off, 2008 BMW 320 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Hardbody. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Hardbody would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 320 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (123 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 320 (330 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Hardbody. (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Hardbody.

Compare all specifications:

2008 BMW 320 2006 Nissan Hardbody
Make BMW Nissan
Model 320 Hardbody
Year Released 2008 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 148 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 330 Nm 174 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Acceleration 0-100mph 9.7 seconds 13.6 seconds
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Wheelbase Size 2730 mm 2960 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.3 L/100km 11.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 63 L 90 L