2008 BMW 320 vs. 2012 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2012 Jaguar XF is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2008 BMW 320. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 320.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 320. (201 Nm). This means 2012 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 320.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 320 | 2012 Jaguar XF | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 320 | XF |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 201 Nm | 450 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.7 seconds | 8 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4961 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1461 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2908 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.9 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |