2008 BMW 323 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 BMW 323 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 224 more horse power than 2008 BMW 323. (176 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 306 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 323. (230 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 323.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 323 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 323 | CTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 5965 cc |
Horse Power | 176 HP | 400 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 230 Nm | 536 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 12.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |