2008 BMW 325 vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2008 BMW 325 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 325 (190 HP) has 120 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 325 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 325 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 325 | 2004 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | BMW | MCC |
Model | 325 | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 1810 mm |