2008 BMW 328 vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW 328 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 328 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1963 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 575 kg more than 2008 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW 328 | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 328 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 231 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 79 L |
