2008 BMW 328 vs. 1963 Rover 2000
To start off, 2008 BMW 328 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW 328 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 328 (230 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1963 Rover 2000. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1963 Rover 2000.
Because 2008 BMW 328 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Rover 2000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 328 (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Rover 2000. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 328 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Rover 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 328 | 1963 Rover 2000 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 328 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 1978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 54 L |