2008 BMW 328 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2008 BMW 328 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Equinox would be higher. At 3,425 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 328 (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox. (182 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Equinox.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Equinox (286 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Equinox will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 328 | 2005 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 328 | Equinox |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 3425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 286 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 64 L |