2008 BMW 328 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW 328. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW 328 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 2008 BMW 328. (231 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW 328.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 298 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 328. (271 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 328 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 328 | Camaro |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 231 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.7 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 72 L |