2008 BMW 523 vs. 2005 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 BMW 523 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 523 (175 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Sable. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 523 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercury Sable weights approximately 13 kg more than 2008 BMW 523.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Sable (252 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 523. (230 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 523.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 523 | 2005 Mercury Sable | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | 523 | Sable |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 252 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |