2008 BMW 525 vs. 1972 Rover 3.5
To start off, 2008 BMW 525 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover 3.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover 3.5 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Rover 3.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Rover 3.5 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2008 BMW 525.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Rover 3.5 (276 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 525. (250 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1972 Rover 3.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 525 | 1972 Rover 3.5 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 525 | 3.5 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 3532 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 276 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 71.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2820 mm |