2008 BMW 525 vs. 1995 Rover 800
To start off, 2008 BMW 525 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 800 would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Rover 800 weights approximately 29 kg more than 2008 BMW 525.
Because 2008 BMW 525 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW 525. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Rover 800, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 525 (250 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 800. (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 525 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 800.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 525 | 1995 Rover 800 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | 525 | 800 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2675 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 167 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 225 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1524 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 68 L |