2008 BMW 525 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 BMW 525 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 525 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 850 kg more than 2008 BMW 525.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Ford Econoline (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 525. (250 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 525.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 525 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 525 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 250 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1475 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5050 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |