2008 BMW 525 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW 525. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW 525 would be higher. At 3,701 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 525 (215 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 525 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 549 kg more than 2008 BMW 525.

Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW 525. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 525. (250 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 525. 2009 Jeep Commander has automatic transmission and 2008 BMW 525 has manual transmission. 2008 BMW 525 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Commander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2008 BMW 525 2009 Jeep Commander
Make BMW Jeep
Model 525 Commander
Year Released 2008 2009
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2494 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 215 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 6500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 319 Nm
Torque RPM 2900 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1494 kg 2043 kg
Vehicle Length 4850 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2790 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 9.4 L/100km 14.9 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 80 L