2008 BMW 528 vs. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2008 BMW 528 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 600 kg more than 2008 BMW 528.
Because 2008 BMW 528 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW 528 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 528 | 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | 528 | Silver Shadow |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 230 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 241 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 4.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 107 L |