2008 BMW 530 vs. 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager

To start off, 2008 BMW 530 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW 530 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 115 kg more than 2008 BMW 530.

Because 2008 BMW 530 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW 530. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 530 (480 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (227 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 530 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager.

Compare all specifications:

2008 BMW 530 2000 Chrysler Grand Voyager
Make BMW Chrysler
Model 530 Grand Voyager
Year Released 2008 2000
Body Type Station Wagon Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2992 cc 2429 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 0 HP 148 HP
Torque 480 Nm 227 Nm
Torque RPM 1750 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90 mm 101 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 17.0:1 9.4:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1590 kg 1705 kg
Vehicle Length 4870 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Height 1470 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 3040 mm