2008 BMW 530 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2008 BMW 530 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 210 kg more than 2008 BMW 530.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Jaguar F-Type has automatic transmission and 2008 BMW 530 has manual transmission. 2008 BMW 530 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Jaguar F-Type will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 530 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 530 | F-Type |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 4194 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Top Speed | 244 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2390 mm |