2008 BMW 530 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2008 BMW 530 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,162 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 639 kg more than 2008 BMW 530.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW 530. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW 530. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW 530.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 530 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 530 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4162 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 89.6 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1608 kg | 2247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3280 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 95 L |