2008 BMW 540 vs. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2008 BMW 540 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW 540 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 379 kg more than 2008 BMW 540.
Because 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW 540. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 540 (440 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2008 BMW 540 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 540 | 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 540 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4162 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 275 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 2084 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 83 L |