2008 BMW 645 vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 BMW 645 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 BMW 645 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW 645 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW 645 should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Econoline weights approximately 510 kg more than 2008 BMW 645.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 645 (450 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 BMW 645 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 645 | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 645 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 198 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3510 mm |