2008 BMW 735 vs. 2000 Ford e-Ka
To start off, 2008 BMW 735 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford e-Ka. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford e-Ka would be higher. At 3,600 cc, 2008 BMW 735 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 735 weights approximately 727 kg more than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Because 2008 BMW 735 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW 735. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford e-Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 735 (360 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford e-Ka. (190 Nm). This means 2008 BMW 735 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford e-Ka.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW 735 | 2000 Ford e-Ka | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 735 | e-Ka |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1758 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 154 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1935 kg | 1208 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2730 mm |
