2008 BMW 735 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2008 BMW 735 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 735 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW 735 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | 735 | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4194 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1935 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2390 mm |
