2008 BMW 760 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2008 BMW 760 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,972 cc (12 cylinders), 2008 BMW 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW 760 weights approximately 918 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW 760. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW 760 (600 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2008 BMW 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW 760 | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 760 | Astro |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5972 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 440 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 600 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2105 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3000 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 88 L | 64 L |