2008 BMW M3 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2008 BMW M3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar XKA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar XKA would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2008 BMW M3. (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW M3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar XKA weights approximately 145 kg more than 2008 BMW M3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 478 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW M3. (365 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M3 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | M3 | XKA |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2590 mm |