2008 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 670 kg more than 2008 BMW M3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW M3 (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M3 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | M3 | Econoline |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 338 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 3510 mm |