2008 BMW M3 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline

To start off, 2008 BMW M3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW M3 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 2003 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 670 kg more than 2008 BMW M3.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW M3 (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford Econoline.

Compare all specifications:

2008 BMW M3 2003 Ford Econoline
Make BMW Ford
Model M3 Econoline
Year Released 2008 2003
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3246 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 338 HP 197 HP
Engine RPM 7900 RPM 4700 RPM
Torque 365 Nm 338 Nm
Torque RPM 4900 RPM 2700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1655 kg 2325 kg
Vehicle Length 4500 mm 5390 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 2020 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 2060 mm
Wheelbase Size 2740 mm 3510 mm