2008 BMW M3 vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 BMW M3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 619 kg more than 2008 BMW M3.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW M3. (400 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW M3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M3 | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
Make | BMW | Nissan |
Model | M3 | Armada |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3999 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 414 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 8300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75.2 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1655 kg | 2274 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 106 L |