2008 BMW M3 vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, both 2008 BMW M3 and 2008 Toyota Condor were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,246 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW M3 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW M3 (365 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Condor. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Condor.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M3 | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | M3 | Condor |
Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1812 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 339 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1570 kg | 1360 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 70 L |