2008 BMW M5 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2008 BMW M5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW M5 (500 HP) has 205 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (295 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW M5 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 598 kg more than 2008 BMW M5.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW M5 (519 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (448 Nm). This means 2008 BMW M5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M5 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M5 | Savana |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 5326 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 295 HP |
Torque | 519 Nm | 448 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1755 kg | 2353 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 13.1 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 117 L |