2008 BMW M6 vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2008 BMW M6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Savana. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Savana would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW M6 (500 HP) has 215 more horse power than 2004 GMC Savana. (285 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW M6 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Savana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 752 kg more than 2008 BMW M6.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW M6 (520 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 GMC Savana. (441 Nm). This means 2008 BMW M6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 GMC Savana.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW M6 | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | M6 | Savana |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4999 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 520 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 12.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 117 L |