2008 BMW X3 vs. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 335 kg more than 2008 BMW X3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | X3 | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 6229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.2 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 81 L |