2008 BMW X3 vs. 1963 Seat 600
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 600 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X3 (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X3 weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1963 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X3 (245 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Seat 600. (40 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 1963 Seat 600 | |
Make | BMW | Seat |
Model | X3 | 600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 40 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1740 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2010 mm |