2008 BMW X3 vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X3 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X3 weights approximately 363 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X3 | Cimarron |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2580 mm |