2008 BMW X3 vs. 1992 Pontiac Bonneville

To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Pontiac Bonneville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Pontiac Bonneville would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X3 (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1992 Pontiac Bonneville. (205 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 1992 Pontiac Bonneville. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X3 weights approximately 129 kg more than 1992 Pontiac Bonneville. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2008 BMW X3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW X3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Pontiac Bonneville (353 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X3. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1992 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X3.

Compare all specifications:

2008 BMW X3 1992 Pontiac Bonneville
Make BMW Pontiac
Model X3 Bonneville
Year Released 2008 1992
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 3791 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 228 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 5900 RPM 4400 RPM
Torque 300 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84 mm 96.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 89.6 mm 86.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.2:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1765 kg 1636 kg
Vehicle Length 4580 mm 5100 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1680 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2820 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]