2008 BMW X3 vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2008 BMW X3. (189 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Jaguar F-Type weights approximately 35 kg more than 2008 BMW X3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X3 | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | X3 | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2494 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 251 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2390 mm |
