2008 BMW X3 vs. 2002 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2008 BMW X3. (228 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X3 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Cadillac DeVille.
Because 2008 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac DeVille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (406 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X3. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 2002 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X3 | DeVille |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 4570 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 275 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 406 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 68 L |