2008 BMW X3 vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jeep Compass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jeep Compass would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2008 BMW X3. (189 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW X3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X3 weights approximately 359 kg more than 2002 Jeep Compass.
Because 2002 Jeep Compass is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW X3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X3. (245 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | X3 | Compass |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 196 km/hour | 177 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1765 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2660 mm |