2008 BMW X3 vs. 2004 GMC Canyon
To start off, 2008 BMW X3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 GMC Canyon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 GMC Canyon would be higher. At 3,458 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 GMC Canyon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X3 (260 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2004 GMC Canyon. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2004 GMC Canyon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Canyon weights approximately 225 kg more than 2008 BMW X3.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 305 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X3 | 2004 GMC Canyon | |
Make | BMW | GMC |
Model | X3 | Canyon |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3001 cc | 3458 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 305 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 93.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1730 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 67 L | 72 L |