2008 BMW X3 vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X3 would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW X3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X3 (260 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Because 2008 BMW X3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X3 (305 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 BMW X3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X3 | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X3 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 260 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 305 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.4 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |
