2008 BMW X5 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,389 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (350 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1961 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1961 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 586 kg more than 2008 BMW X5.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 6389 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 2140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 79 L |