2008 BMW X5 vs. 1961 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 110 kg more than 1961 Cadillac 62.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (480 Nm). This means 1961 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1961 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | X5 | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4619 cc | 6390 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 582 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2070 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 75 L |
