2008 BMW X5 vs. 1961 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1961 Jaguar MK X.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1961 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1961 Jaguar MK X | |
| Make | BMW | Jaguar |
| Model | X5 | MK X |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2977 cc | 3781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2080 kg | 1890 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.2 L/100km | 11.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 90 L |
