2008 BMW X5 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (260 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2008 BMW X5.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 277 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (305 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | 62 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 260 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 582 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 75 L |