2008 BMW X5 vs. 1962 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1161 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx. 2008 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1962 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1962 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1962 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | BMW | Isuzu |
Model | X5 | Minx |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1491 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 75 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2440 mm |