2008 BMW X5 vs. 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 95 kg more than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1966 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
Model | X5 | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 316 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 187 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 81 L |