2008 BMW X5 vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 901 kg more than 1966 Volvo 144.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 273 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | BMW | Volvo |
Model | X5 | 144 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1986 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |