2008 BMW X5 vs. 1969 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1161 kg more than 1969 Jeep CJ5.
Because 1969 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 BMW X5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Jeep CJ5. (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Jeep CJ5. 2008 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1969 Jeep CJ5 has manual transmission. 1969 Jeep CJ5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1969 Jeep CJ5 | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | X5 | CJ5 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1969 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2199 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |
