2008 BMW X5 vs. 1972 Rover P5B
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Rover P5B. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Rover P5B would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1972 Rover P5B. (158 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1972 Rover P5B. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 611 kg more than 1972 Rover P5B. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Rover P5B. (295 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Rover P5B.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1972 Rover P5B | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | X5 | P5B |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3528 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 295 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2820 mm |